Black holes cannot be created by light

July 26, 2024&ball; Physics 17, 119

The formation of a black hole from light alone is allowed by general relativity, but a new study says quantum physics rules it out.

Figure legenddevelop the figure

D. Coe, J. Anderson and R. van der Marel/NASA/ESA/STScI

When light turns dark. According to general relativity, a black hole should be able to form not only from a high concentration of mass, but also from very intense light. This simulated image shows the distortion of starlight around a black hole at the center of a galaxy.

Figure legend

D. Coe, J. Anderson and R. van der Marel/NASA/ESA/STScI

Black holes form from large concentrations of mass, such as extinct stars. But according to general relativity, they can also form from ultra-intense light. Theorists have been speculating on this idea for decades. However, calculations by a team of researchers now suggest that light-induced black holes are not possible after all, because quantum mechanical effects cause too much energy to leak out for the collapse to occur. [1].

The extreme mass density produced by a collapsing star can bend spacetime to such an extent that no light entering the region can escape. The formation of a black hole from light is possible according to general relativity because mass and energy are equivalent, so the energy in an electromagnetic field can also bend spacetime. [2]So-called electromagnetic black holes have become commonly known as Ball flashGerman term meaning “ball lightning”, following the terminology used by Princeton University physicist John Wheeler in early studies of electromagnetically generated gravitational fields in the 1950s [3].

Ball flash Researchers have already been asked for speculative theories describing exotic physical phenomena ranging from dark matter to cosmic censorship – the hypothesis that the singularity inside a black hole is never visible. Light-induced black holes have even been proposed as a means of propulsion for spacecraft. But the question remains: are they really possible?

The problem is that the electromagnetic fields thought to be necessary would generate many quantum particles, because highly concentrated photons could spontaneously decay into electron-positron pairs in a process called the Schwinger effect. These particles, accelerated by the intense electromagnetic field, would then escape from the region, taking energy with them.

The question then becomes whether gravitational collapse would still be possible, or whether the energy loss resulting from the Schwinger effect would jeopardize it. Mathematical physicist José Polo-Gómez of the University of Waterloo in Canada and his colleagues have done some calculations to see which way the balance tips.

Figure legenddevelop the figure

Jason Laurea/LLNL

It’s intense. The exterior of the target chamber (blue sphere) at the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, where some of the world’s brightest lasers are used to briefly trigger nuclear fusion. Future lasers, even more intense, are expected to stimulate the spontaneous creation and emission of electrons and positrons, a process that would ultimately prevent very strong electromagnetic fields from forming a black hole.

Figure legend

Jason Laurea/LLNL

The amount of electromagnetic energy that must be concentrated in a given spherical volume to form a Kugelblitz The theory of general relativity makes it easy to calculate the value of the Schwinger effect, and it depends on the radius, the speed of light, and the gravitational constant. The most difficult part of the problem is to estimate the energy dissipation due to the Schwinger effect, in particular to compare the timescale of particle escape to that of the collapse of the black hole.

One of the main challenges is accounting for how this particle production feeds back on itself, because these particles generate electric fields that influence the creation of more particles. And because the Schwinger effect is more than just a minor correction to black hole formation calculations, “many of the usual tools of quantum field theory are not useful here,” Polo-Gómez and colleagues say in a joint statement. As a result, the researchers had to make simplifying assumptions and approximations, and then demonstrate that these choices did not affect their conclusions.

Polo-Gómez and his colleagues find that the Schwinger effect does indeed dissipate energy from the electromagnetic field before a Kugelblitz can form for all sizes between 10−29 and 108 m. Smaller length scales approach the Planck length, the scale at which quantum field theory breaks down, while at larger scales, no known process in the universe would be energetic enough to create black holes from light. “We think our results put an end to the debate,” Polo-Gómez and colleagues say. “It would be scientifically wonderful to be able to create microscopic black holes using very intense lasers, but our research shows that this is not possible.”

“The results seem convincing to me,” says Silvia Pla García, an expert in quantum field theory and gravity at King’s College London. She adds that the researchers’ approximations all seem reasonable. “This work is exciting from a theoretical point of view because it shows how different things can be when you take quantum effects into account,” she says. She notes that this question has long been debated for classical black holes, which are predicted to slowly evaporate due to pair production near their surfaces. Theoretical physicist Reinhard Alkofer of the University of Graz in Austria agrees that the results are convincing, although he adds that other experts have long suspected that quantum effects could undermine quantum theory. Ball flash.

Polo-Gómez and his colleagues say that even if their calculations cannot be verified experimentally, the predicted creation of particle pairs by the Schwinger effect could potentially be observed. Higher-intensity lasers generate electric fields only 1,000 times weaker than the threshold for creating such particles, they say, so future lasers might be able to generate this effect.

–Philippe Ball

Philip Ball is a freelance science writer based in London. His latest book is How life works (Picador, 2024).

The references

A. Alvarez-Dominguez et al.“No black holes due to light” Rev. Phys. Lett. 133041401 (2024).

JMM Senovilla, “Formation of black holes by incoming electromagnetic radiation”, Classical quantum gravity 32017001 (2014).

JA Wheeler, “Geons”, Rev. Phys. 97511 (1955).

Fields of study

Dark matter could bring black holes closer together

Gravitational wave memory could illustrate space-time symmetries

Colorful primordial black holes

Astrophysics

Colorful primordial black holes

June 6, 2024

Some ultra-light black holes that formed shortly after the Big Bang may have been exotic objects with a net “color charge” that left potentially observable signatures. Read more »